Archive for the ‘Mar09’ Category

State Library Jumps into Social Media with a Presence on Facebook

Tuesday, March 3rd, 2009

 

 

To create a greater awareness of the activities at the State Library of Kansas (SLK), we are now on Facebook.  In addition to information about the State Library, Facebook gives SLK one more opportunity to post activities and events for a wider audience. 

 

Visit the group and see the Kansas photography display we have under way at SLK, see a kickoff message regarding the Kansas Reads One Book Program, and read about the Library Advocacy Day at the Statehouse. 

 

If you’re interested, it’s easy to use Facebook.  Go to www.facebook.com and sign up.  Plan to look at the State Library’s Facebook page and become a fan.  This link will take you directly to the group:

 

http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/group.php?gid=39491687196 

 

thumbnail11

Review of Newbery Winner

Tuesday, March 3rd, 2009

The Graveyard Book

By Neil Gaiman; illustrated by Dave McKean 

Reviewed by Hollis Helmeci, El Dorado Public Library

51mo4ysdb-l_sl160_pisitb-sticker-arrow-dptopright12-18_sh30_ou01_aa115_

The Graveyard Book’s black, opening page showing a hand holding a knife clearly sets the scene for the start of Nobody Owens’ life in the graveyard.  If there should be any doubt that danger is in the house, the book begins, “There was a hand in the darkness, and it held a knife.”  And how does an 18-month-old boy escape such a threat?  It could be his special fate, or it could be an ordinary sort of 18-month-old escape.

Nobody Owens (nicknamed Bod) is raised in the graveyard by the ghosts who teach him Fading, Dreamwalking, and other skills.  Bod’s unusual caretaker – Silas – can leave the graveyard to buy food and other worldly necessities.  Bod receives an erratic, complex education from those who once lived.  His only living friend is Scarlett Amber Perkins, who visits the graveyard when she is five, but shortly thereafter moves to Scotland. 

When Scarlett leaves, Bod meets another “person” called Miss Lupescu.  She teaches him languages, constellations, and other things.  Bod, far from a perfect student, fails when it comes to naming people:  “’The living,’ he said. ‘Er.  The dead.’  He stopped.  Then, ‘. . . Cats?’” Miss Lepescu is not pleased.  And Bod is not pleased, as Miss Lupescu feeds him very Slavic food, leading to his visit with the dangerous Ghouls.  Yet, Bod remains safe in the graveyard for many years.  We see his safety, and his danger, in the dramatically-rendered, strangely-proportioned illustrations of the book. 

Finally, it is Bod’s compassion that leads him into town to pawn a stolen brooch so he can buy a gift for the graveyard’s witch.  Bod’s sense of decency endangers him, and reveals him to the “hand in the darkness.”  This danger, which has sought him so many years, is ultimately his catalyst into adulthood.

Bod must leave the graveyard and the odd kindness of the dead, as he must realize that not all the living are as he.  Bod leaves his unusual protectors, who are devoted to him as would be perfect parents seeking to fulfill what Silas calls Bod’s “infinite potential.”  As Bod comes of age, growing seemlessly from the 18-month-old baby to the young man, he experiences the broad range of human activity, both good and bad, until he can no longer live among the dead. 

Why would this book receive the 2009 Newbery Medal?  Because it has the grace and lightness that life requires from the young.  We see Bod grow internally, and discover that doing good and being kind generates better results than being mean and self-righteous.  Nobody Owens is truly like “nobody but himself.”  He is what every child has the potential to be, he is the native wildness of the human spirit exploring his tiny world completely — until he his grown and must go into the greater world to explore it completely.  And he knows the loss that buys his adulthood, made physically clear in several ways including a blow to the head.  Bod must suffer the range of adulthood before he can become an adult, and this is why adults will read this book with the same attentiveness that younger readers will.

Review of Notable Book

Tuesday, March 3rd, 2009

Sea Monsters: Prehistoric Creatures of the Deep
By Michael Everhart

Reviewed by Cynthia Akers, Notable Books Committee

51w-egy2ual_sl500_aa240_

Michael Everhart’s Oceans of Kansas was named as a Kansas Notable Book in 2006.  His latest book is both a worthy follow-up and an incredibly interesting pictorial overview of ocean life we can only imagine otherwise.  Through the technology of 3-D film clips, computer-generated images, and the talents of camera operators from National Geographic, we are treated to realistic depictions of the creatures that inhabited a sea over 82 million years ago and, amazingly, covered our Great Plains. In addition, theories about the eventual extinction of various species are covered.  Also featured is the story of the Sternberg family and George Sternberg, the paleontologist who discovered the “fish within a fish” fossil in Gove County, Kansas.

Sea Monsters is the official book accompaniment to the National Geographic IMAX movie of the same name.  However, the book easily stands on its own as an insightful, beautifully illustrated page-turner.

Michael Everhart is the Curator of Paleontology at the Sternberg Museum of Natural History at Fort Hays State University.

Consult the Cat

Tuesday, March 3rd, 2009

Dear Cat,

Do you know of any resources that do a good job of explaining what librarians mean when they talk about Library 2.0?

blackcat-2

This question came in from Betty Burrows, the director in Baxter Springs. The Cat might have been inclined to gulp, groom her shoulder blade and wrap her tail around her paws at this question. But, in fact, there was a thread on Publib at the end of January that she found helpful.

There has been a lot of grumbling about Library 2.0, mostly to the effect that: A, It isn’t well defined, or B, It doesn’t exist.

What the Cat took out of the January discussion was the point that 2.0 isn’t just excellent customer service, which librarians have indeed been doing for a long time. Nor is it just the use of cutting edge library technology, which librarians can argue about until time gets mixed up with eternity.

The best respected definitions emphasize the fact that it is user-centered change in library service that makes the library an active partner with its service community.

Michael Casey commented:

“The heart of Library 2.0 is user-centered change. It is a model for library service that encourages constant and purposeful change, inviting user participation in the creation of both the physical and the virtual services they want, supported by consistently evaluating services. It also attempts to reach new users and better serve current ones through improved customer-driven offerings.”

Sarah Houghton’s definition also gets repeated in a number of places:

Library 2.0 simply means making your library’s space (virutal and physical) more interactive, collaborative and driven by community needs. Examples of where to start include blogs, gaming nights and collaborative photo sites. The basic drive is to get people back into the library by making the library relevant to what they want and need in their daily lives — to make the library a destination and not an afterthought.

Wickipedia is often a good place to start, although usually not a great place to stop.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_2.0

Library Journal had a good article by Michael Casey and Laura Savastinik about the time the discussion started to turn white-hot. It was called “Library 2.0: Service for the Next Generation Library.”

http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6365200.html

Another Publib poster recommended John Blyberg’s article, “Eleven Reasons Why Library 2.0 Exists and Matters.”

http://tametheweb.com/2006/01/09/11-reasons-why-library-20-exists-and-matters/

Walt Crawford devoted a whole issue of Cites and Insights to Library 2.0 and “Library 2.0.” He does a good job of reflecting the chaos on the topic in 2006 and a good job of showcasing the “people with lots to say” on the topic. He also points out that being confrontational with the subject is counterproductive, but that exciting changes are continuing to take place in libraries where people are offering service and not yelling about it. His article is 31 pages, but well worth a review.

http://citesandinsights.info/civ6i2.pdf

After reviewing these materials, the Cat asked her cat family what they thought of this concept. Their response was very revealing:

“What you mean is that we should run this household. As if we hadn’t been saying that for years! Cat 2.0 is easy. We want a hotpad big enough for the whole family, a constant supply of fresh water, a perpetual cat feeder in addition to two wet meals and two milk breaks every day. We want a kitty door so WE can decide when we go in and out 24/7. We want it clearly understood that the human lap is available for cuddling whenever the human is home.”

The Cat didn’t bother to point out the health-related and safety-related reasons why some of this was unlikely to happen. She was reminded all too clearly of a certain library user who wants total access 24/7, wants to follow her nose all over the Internet, wants the books mailed to her, wants to comment on everything and wants the cafe open all the hours that the library is open.

None of this material cited in this article is hot off the press in 2009, but maybe that is part of the point as well. People are spending less time talking about the Revolution! and more time evolving the library services that will quietly make the library a partner with the library users in creating excellent library service. Such partners certainly deserve a purr from the

Cat